Great Plotting: Eileen Wilks

My incarceration by physical injury continues and thus so has my reading blitz.  (Still recovering from a herniated disc.)

This week has been all Eileen Wilks all the time.  And I feel that I have been in the presence of a master plotter.  Yes, her characterization was great:  the characters appealing, realistic and experiencing understandable growing pains as she puts them through their paces.  And her magical world was interesting, cohesive and believable (in the way that all fantasy worlds can be believable).  I’m speaking here of her Books of the Lupi series.  But it was the plotting that blew me away.

To be fair, as a Panster, I’m inclined to be more in awe of someone who is excellent at plotting than perhaps of someone with great characterization.  That said, Eileen Wilks has mad plotting skills.

It wasn’t just the complexity of the individual books.  Though they had that.  The plots were well paced, the twists and turns intriguing.  It all flowed, coherent and tight.  And this woman is a master at ending chapters at a high tension point that has you compulsively going into the next chapter to find out what the <insert your favourite intense word> happened.

What truly awed me was the multi-book plotting that she did.  This author didn’t wait until a character would be necessary or useful to introduce them.  Oh, no, they became a small, integral part of an earlier book and when they appeared in a later book, it was logical and necessary that they be there.

It’s a little hard to talk about this without using examples, but I hate it when people give away spoilers, so please forgive me the generalities.

It also wasn’t just characters.  The advantage of reading a series back to back, or a series’ downfall, is that all of the details are present in the back of my head.  If the wrong age is used, I notice it (and I think that was about the only error I found in the books was a slight age discrepency, though there is a chance I mis-remembered the first mention of it).  If the character is not consistent in small preferences and attitudes, I’m aware of it.

And if they are consistent, I revel in it.

Ms. Wilks did that.  She planted seeds of motivation, of potential trouble, of inconsequential items that are picked up in the next book, or two later, or three later.  When those seeds sprouted and blossomed it made sense on some subliminal level so that as a reader I greeted those blooms enthusiastically because they had been planted so much earlier.  I never felt that she ‘cheated’ by bringing in a needed element at the last minute.

The Lupi books are a tapestry of plotting.  The weaving is complex and thorough and, frankly, if I can handle multiple books half that well–okay, two thirds that well, I’ll be truly pleased with myself.

And yes, in case it wasn’t obvious, I would recommend the series.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s